i have the audacity to actually keep posting!!!
has anyone considered that "catching students at cheating" is ritualistic (i.e., Merton's ritualism) behavior? have we not lost sight of what teaching in general and sociology in particular are about? and since when did students become the enemy and/or a population that we need to be on guard of? are students really that different than any other population of people? i learned that lesson quickly when working with felony probationers; really not that much of a difference between them and others.
curious, the derision that students are afforded by many; almost as if there is a distinction between a "good" student and a "bad" student...where in my sociological training did i miss out on the notion that MORE categorization and ranking of peoples is a good thing? i understand the "in defense of elitism" attitude, but i much prefer those that embrace such an ideology to be upfront about it rather than masquerade as caring educators.
"catching students cheating" is not about education, it is about preserving an institutional relationship that is more reflective of the 19th century than the 21st. or at the very least, more reflective of elementary school than college. truly a bizarre notion, really.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
THere has definitely been a growth of a panic around cheating students as managerialism has tightened its grip on academia, and it's become more concerned with targets and figures, But that said for any discipline to be taken seriously some integrity is required, which does mean a line has to be taken against cheating. But how we go about defining 'cheating', well ...
Post a Comment